Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach.
- Authors
- Joseph G. Fortner
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w43671259 →Countries where authors are citing Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach.
This map shows the geographic impact of Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach.
This network shows the impact of Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach..
About Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach.
This paper, published in 1973, received 318 indexed citations . Written by Joseph G. Fortner covering the research area of Oncology, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (295 citations), Surgery (214 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (131 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w43671259.