Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary

478 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 478 indexed citations. Written by Stephen J. Ball covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (341 citations), Political Science and International Relations (293 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (173 citations). Published in UCL Discovery (University College London).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w43669976 →

Countries where authors are citing Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w43669976.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026