Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults

761 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1992, received 761 indexed citations. Written by Mark P. Jensen and Paul Karoly covering the research area of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmacology (444 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (179 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (172 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w43358763 →

Countries where authors are citing Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w43358763.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026