Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design
- Authors
- Bill Buxton
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w42937944 →Countries where authors are citing Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design
This map shows the geographic impact of Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design
This network shows the impact of Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design.
About Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design
This paper, published in 2007, received 821 indexed citations . Written by Bill Buxton. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Human-Computer Interaction (506 citations), Mechanical Engineering (207 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (161 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (84 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (81 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w42937944.