A method for extraction of arterial emboli and thrombi.
Impact in
- Surgery 214
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w42788571 →Countries where authors are citing A method for extraction of arterial emboli and thrombi.
This map shows the geographic impact of A method for extraction of arterial emboli and thrombi.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A method for extraction of arterial emboli and thrombi. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A method for extraction of arterial emboli and thrombi. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A method for extraction of arterial emboli and thrombi.
This network shows the impact of A method for extraction of arterial emboli and thrombi.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A method for extraction of arterial emboli and thrombi..
About A method for extraction of arterial emboli and thrombi.
This paper, published in 1963, received 304 indexed citations . Written by Thomas J. Fogarty, John J. Cranley, Raymond J. Krause and Charles D. Hafner covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Internal Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (214 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (180 citations), Internal Medicine (129 citations), Epidemiology (67 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (38 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w42788571.