Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w42673442 →Countries where authors are citing Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings
This map shows the geographic impact of Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings
This network shows the impact of Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings.
About Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings
This paper, published in 2000, received 635 indexed citations . Written by Ronald O. Hamburger, John Hooper, Thomas A. Sabol, Robert E. Shaw, Lawrence D. Reaveley, Raymond H.R. Tide and William J. Hall covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Civil and Structural Engineering (622 citations), Building and Construction (249 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (72 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w42673442.