Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study

549 indexed citations
published 1978

Countries where authors are citing Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study.

About Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study

This paper, published in 1978, received 549 indexed citations . Written by Anita Stewart, John E. Ware, Robert H. Brook and Allyson Ross Davies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (192 citations), Health (117 citations) and Clinical Psychology (99 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w42315672.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026