Gsi: A Geologically Friendly Tool For Rock Mass Strength Estimation
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Π. ΜαρίνοςE. Hoek
- Journal
- ISRM International Symposium
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4207122 →Countries where authors are citing Gsi: A Geologically Friendly Tool For Rock Mass Strength Estimation
This map shows the geographic impact of Gsi: A Geologically Friendly Tool For Rock Mass Strength Estimation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gsi: A Geologically Friendly Tool For Rock Mass Strength Estimation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gsi: A Geologically Friendly Tool For Rock Mass Strength Estimation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Gsi: A Geologically Friendly Tool For Rock Mass Strength Estimation
This network shows the impact of Gsi: A Geologically Friendly Tool For Rock Mass Strength Estimation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gsi: A Geologically Friendly Tool For Rock Mass Strength Estimation.
About Gsi: A Geologically Friendly Tool For Rock Mass Strength Estimation
This paper, published in 2000, received 406 indexed citations . Written by Π. Μαρίνος and E. Hoek covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Ocean Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (284 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (196 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (190 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (178 citations) and Ocean Engineering (69 citations). Published in ISRM International Symposium.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4207122.