Psychopharmacology : a generation of progress
- Authors
- Morris A. LiptonAlberto DiMascio
- Journal
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w42068130 →Countries where authors are citing Psychopharmacology : a generation of progress
This map shows the geographic impact of Psychopharmacology : a generation of progress. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Psychopharmacology : a generation of progress with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychopharmacology : a generation of progress more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Psychopharmacology : a generation of progress
This network shows the impact of Psychopharmacology : a generation of progress. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Psychopharmacology : a generation of progress.
About Psychopharmacology : a generation of progress
This paper, published in 1978, received 728 indexed citations . Written by Morris A. Lipton and Alberto DiMascio. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (291 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (201 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (150 citations). Published in DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w42068130.