CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w41806135 →Countries where authors are citing CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain
This map shows the geographic impact of CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain
This network shows the impact of CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain.
About CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain
This paper, published in 2016, received 249 indexed citations . Written by Tamara M. Haegerich, Deborah Dowell and David Tauben covering the research area of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (182 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (117 citations) and Pharmacology (55 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w41806135.