Script processing in attitude formation and decision making.
- Authors
- Robert P. Abelson
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w41733238 →Countries where authors are citing Script processing in attitude formation and decision making.
This map shows the geographic impact of Script processing in attitude formation and decision making.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Script processing in attitude formation and decision making.
This network shows the impact of Script processing in attitude formation and decision making.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Script processing in attitude formation and decision making..
About Script processing in attitude formation and decision making.
This paper, published in 1976, received 460 indexed citations . Written by Robert P. Abelson. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (155 citations), Social Psychology (134 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (68 citations), General Decision Sciences (53 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (45 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w41733238.