From etymology to pragmatics metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure

794 indexed citations
published 1998
Authors
Eve Sweetser

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w41510745 →

Countries where authors are citing From etymology to pragmatics metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of From etymology to pragmatics metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by From etymology to pragmatics metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites From etymology to pragmatics metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure more than expected).

Fields of papers citing From etymology to pragmatics metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of From etymology to pragmatics metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the From etymology to pragmatics metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure.

About From etymology to pragmatics metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure

This paper, published in 1998, received 794 indexed citations . Written by Eve Sweetser covering the research area of Language and Linguistics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (543 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (478 citations) and Philosophy (140 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w41510745.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026