The global politics of educational borrowing and lending
- Journal
- Teachers College Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4147391 →Countries where authors are citing The global politics of educational borrowing and lending
This map shows the geographic impact of The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The global politics of educational borrowing and lending with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The global politics of educational borrowing and lending more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The global politics of educational borrowing and lending
This network shows the impact of The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The global politics of educational borrowing and lending.
About The global politics of educational borrowing and lending
This paper, published in 2004, received 532 indexed citations . Written by Gita Steiner‐Khamsi and Thomas S. Popkewitz covering the research area of Political Science and International Relations and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (398 citations), Political Science and International Relations (374 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (158 citations). Published in Teachers College Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4147391.