Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism
- Authors
- Guy Peters
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w41423331 →Countries where authors are citing Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism
This map shows the geographic impact of Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism
This network shows the impact of Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism.
About Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism
This paper, published in 1999, received 992 indexed citations . Written by Guy Peters. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (546 citations), Sociology and Political Science (310 citations), Public Administration (158 citations), Strategy and Management (156 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (95 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w41423331.