Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies
- Authors
- Lin Naing
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w41349238 →Countries where authors are citing Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies
This map shows the geographic impact of Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies
This network shows the impact of Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies.
About Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies
This paper, published in 2006, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Lin Naing covering the research area of Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (169 citations), Epidemiology (149 citations) and General Health Professions (137 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w41349238.