Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers

600 indexed citations
published 2007
Authors
Michael R. Chernick
Journal
CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w41265945 →

Countries where authors are citing Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers.

About Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers

This paper, published in 2007, received 600 indexed citations . Written by Michael R. Chernick covering the research area of Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics and Probability (70 citations), Global and Planetary Change (63 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (45 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w41265945.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Transitions in Distinct Histone H3 Methylation Patterns at the Heterochromatin Domain BoundariesBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Nonclassical CD1d-restricted NK T cells that produce IL-13 characterize an atypical Th2 response in ulcerative colitisBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper TOBI: a standard for labeling English prosodyBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product DevelopmentBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Association between noninvasive fibrosis markers and mortality among adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the United StatesBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Polyester Textiles as a Source of Microplastics from Households: A Mechanistic Study to Understand Microfiber Release During WashingBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Self‐Healing Polymer CoatingsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Toxigenic Fusarium species. Identity and mycotoxicology.Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Genetic association analyses implicate aberrant regulation of innate and adaptive immunity genes in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosusBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES.
Rankless by CCL
2026