Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer
- Authors
- Richard E. Palmer
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4123702 →Countries where authors are citing Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer
This map shows the geographic impact of Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer
This network shows the impact of Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer.
About Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer
This paper, published in 1969, received 300 indexed citations . Written by Richard E. Palmer covering the research area of Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (92 citations), Education (74 citations) and Philosophy (62 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4123702.