ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION

668 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1965, received 668 indexed citations. Written by Geoffrey H. Ball and David J. Hall covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (209 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (156 citations) and Media Technology (104 citations). Published in Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w41168414 →

Countries where authors are citing ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION more than expected).

Fields of papers citing ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w41168414.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026