TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES
- Authors
- Terry L. Erwin
- Journal
- The Coleopterists Bulletin
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4109737 →Countries where authors are citing TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES
This map shows the geographic impact of TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES more than expected).
Fields of papers citing TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES
This network shows the impact of TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES.
About TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES
This paper, published in 1982, received 653 indexed citations . Written by Terry L. Erwin covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (372 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (258 citations) and Ecology (241 citations). Published in The Coleopterists Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4109737.