On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions.

541 indexed citations
published 2010
Journal
PubMed

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w40225619 →

Countries where authors are citing On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions..

About On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions.

This paper, published in 2010, received 541 indexed citations . Written by Ann Wennerberg and Tomas Albrektsson covering the research area of Orthodontics, Biomedical Engineering and Oral Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oral Surgery (400 citations), Biomedical Engineering (371 citations) and Orthodontics (208 citations). Published in PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w40225619.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026