Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w39681655 →Countries where authors are citing Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report.
This map shows the geographic impact of Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report.
This network shows the impact of Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report..
About Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report.
This paper, published in 1990, received 819 indexed citations . Written by C. Norman Shealy, J. Thomas Mortimer and J. B. Reswick covering the research area of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cell Biology and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (645 citations), Pharmacology (445 citations) and Neurology (285 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w39681655.