Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w39503594 →Countries where authors are citing Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes.
This map shows the geographic impact of Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes.
This network shows the impact of Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes..
About Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes.
This paper, published in 1988, received 518 indexed citations . Written by Jost B. Jonas, Gabriele C. Gusek and G. O. H. Naumann covering the research area of Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Ophthalmology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ophthalmology (499 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (372 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (66 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w39503594.