To vote or not to vote? the merits and limits of rational choice theory

540 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2000, received 540 indexed citations. Written by André Blais covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (427 citations), Sociology and Political Science (229 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (132 citations). Published in University of Pittsburgh Digital Library.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w39484430 →

Countries where authors are citing To vote or not to vote? the merits and limits of rational choice theory

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of To vote or not to vote? the merits and limits of rational choice theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by To vote or not to vote? the merits and limits of rational choice theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites To vote or not to vote? the merits and limits of rational choice theory more than expected).

Fields of papers citing To vote or not to vote? the merits and limits of rational choice theory

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of To vote or not to vote? the merits and limits of rational choice theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the To vote or not to vote? the merits and limits of rational choice theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w39484430.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026