Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants
- Authors
- R. A. LelliottD. E. Stead
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w39483971 →Countries where authors are citing Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants
This map shows the geographic impact of Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants
This network shows the impact of Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants.
About Methods for the diagnosis of bacterial diseases of plants
This paper, published in 1987, received 557 indexed citations . Written by R. A. Lelliott and D. E. Stead covering the research area of Plant Science and Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (540 citations), Cell Biology (282 citations), Molecular Biology (37 citations), Endocrinology (23 citations) and Pharmacology (22 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w39483971.