Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research
- Authors
- Norman Fairclough
- Journal
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w39319944 →Countries where authors are citing Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research
This map shows the geographic impact of Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research
This network shows the impact of Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research.
About Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research
This paper, published in 2003, received 3.6k indexed citations . Written by Norman Fairclough covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Linguistics and Language. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (1.2k citations), Literature and Literary Theory (1.1k citations) and Education (703 citations). Published in Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w39319944.