Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use.

394 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1977, received 394 indexed citations. Written by E B Hook covering the research area of Cancer Research and Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (261 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (152 citations) and Molecular Biology (107 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w39221709 →

Countries where authors are citing Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w39221709.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026