Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
- Authors
- EDWARD E. JONES
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w39126640 →Countries where authors are citing Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
This map shows the geographic impact of Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
This network shows the impact of Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior.
About Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
This paper, published in 1987, received 2.3k indexed citations . Written by EDWARD E. JONES. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (1.1k citations), Social Psychology (849 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (342 citations), Applied Psychology (277 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (273 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w39126640.