Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory

1.0k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1982, received 1.0k indexed citations. Written by John A. Swets and Ronald M. Pickett covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (186 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (186 citations) and Statistics and Probability (130 citations). Published in Academic Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3877008 →

Countries where authors are citing Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3877008.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026