The Chemist's Companion: A Handbook of Practical Data, Techniques, and References

1.5k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1972, received 1.5k indexed citations. Written by Arnold J. Gordon and R.A. Ford covering the research area of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (849 citations), Materials Chemistry (411 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (263 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w38544779 →

Countries where authors are citing The Chemist's Companion: A Handbook of Practical Data, Techniques, and References

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Chemist's Companion: A Handbook of Practical Data, Techniques, and References. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Chemist's Companion: A Handbook of Practical Data, Techniques, and References with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Chemist's Companion: A Handbook of Practical Data, Techniques, and References more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Chemist's Companion: A Handbook of Practical Data, Techniques, and References

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Chemist's Companion: A Handbook of Practical Data, Techniques, and References. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Chemist's Companion: A Handbook of Practical Data, Techniques, and References.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w38544779.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026