Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process
- Authors
- Kenneth S. Rubin
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w38380316 →Countries where authors are citing Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process
This map shows the geographic impact of Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process
This network shows the impact of Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process.
About Essential Scrum: A Practical Guide to the Most Popular Agile Process
This paper, published in 2012, received 282 indexed citations . Written by Kenneth S. Rubin covering the research area of Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (193 citations), Computer Science Applications (43 citations) and Management Information Systems (43 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w38380316.