The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age
- Authors
- Hans Jonas
- Journal
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w38211939 →Countries where authors are citing The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age
This map shows the geographic impact of The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age
This network shows the impact of The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age.
About The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age
This paper, published in 1985, received 608 indexed citations . Written by Hans Jonas covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (199 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (90 citations) and Philosophy (74 citations). Published in DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w38211939.