Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0

1.5k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 1.5k indexed citations. Written by Thomas Erl, John Evdemon, Diane Jordan, Dieter König and Simon Moser covering the research area of Management Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (1.3k citations), Management Information Systems (796 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (744 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w38123444 →

Countries where authors are citing Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w38123444.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026