Fowl cholera: gel diffusion precipitin test for serotyping Pasteruella multocida from avian species.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w38038753 →Countries where authors are citing Fowl cholera: gel diffusion precipitin test for serotyping Pasteruella multocida from avian species.
This map shows the geographic impact of Fowl cholera: gel diffusion precipitin test for serotyping Pasteruella multocida from avian species.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fowl cholera: gel diffusion precipitin test for serotyping Pasteruella multocida from avian species. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fowl cholera: gel diffusion precipitin test for serotyping Pasteruella multocida from avian species. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fowl cholera: gel diffusion precipitin test for serotyping Pasteruella multocida from avian species.
This network shows the impact of Fowl cholera: gel diffusion precipitin test for serotyping Pasteruella multocida from avian species.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fowl cholera: gel diffusion precipitin test for serotyping Pasteruella multocida from avian species..
About Fowl cholera: gel diffusion precipitin test for serotyping Pasteruella multocida from avian species.
This paper, published in 1973, received 373 indexed citations . Written by K. L. Heddleston, Joseph Gallagher and P. A. Rebers covering the research area of Immunology, Epidemiology and Microbiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Microbiology (359 citations), Plant Science (165 citations) and Virology (109 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w38038753.