Atom movements: Diffusion and mass transport in solids
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- J. Philibert
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w37955567 →Countries where authors are citing Atom movements: Diffusion and mass transport in solids
This map shows the geographic impact of Atom movements: Diffusion and mass transport in solids. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Atom movements: Diffusion and mass transport in solids with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Atom movements: Diffusion and mass transport in solids more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Atom movements: Diffusion and mass transport in solids
This network shows the impact of Atom movements: Diffusion and mass transport in solids. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Atom movements: Diffusion and mass transport in solids.
About Atom movements: Diffusion and mass transport in solids
This paper, published in 1991, received 540 indexed citations . Written by J. Philibert covering the research area of Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Biomedical Engineering and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (297 citations), Mechanical Engineering (231 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (112 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (94 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (64 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w37955567.