A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy.

767 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1986, received 767 indexed citations. Written by George H. Rosenfield and Katherine Fitzpatrick-Lins covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (339 citations), Global and Planetary Change (268 citations) and Media Technology (237 citations). Published in Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3791036 →

Countries where authors are citing A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3791036.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026