Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness
Impact in
- Authors
- Roger Penrose
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3785530 →Countries where authors are citing Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness
This map shows the geographic impact of Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness
This network shows the impact of Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness.
About Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness
This paper, published in 1994, received 486 indexed citations . Written by Roger Penrose. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (140 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (116 citations), Artificial Intelligence (98 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (78 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3785530.