Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society.
Impact in
- Epidemiology 161
Classified as
- Authors
- RC Kessler
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w37817294 →Countries where authors are citing Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society.
This map shows the geographic impact of Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society.
This network shows the impact of Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society..
About Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society.
This paper, published in 2000, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by RC Kessler covering the research area of Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (917 citations), Epidemiology (161 citations), General Health Professions (156 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (109 citations) and Social Psychology (101 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w37817294.