Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry

1.6k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 1.6k indexed citations. Written by J. Penman, M. L. Gytarsky, Taka Hiraishi, T. Krug, Dina Kruger, Riitta Pipatti, L. V. Buendia, Koji Miwa, Todd Ngara and Kiyoto Tanabe covering the research area of Soil Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (915 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (559 citations) and Environmental Engineering (456 citations). Published in IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w377115 →

Countries where authors are citing Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w377115.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026