Creating public value : strategic management in government

1.5k indexed citations
published 1995
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w37540797 →

Countries where authors are citing Creating public value : strategic management in government

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Creating public value : strategic management in government. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Creating public value : strategic management in government with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Creating public value : strategic management in government more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Creating public value : strategic management in government

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Creating public value : strategic management in government. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Creating public value : strategic management in government.

About Creating public value : strategic management in government

This paper, published in 1995, received 1.5k indexed citations . Written by Mark H. Moore. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Administration (637 citations), Political Science and International Relations (540 citations), Sociology and Political Science (379 citations), Strategy and Management (297 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (215 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w37540797.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026