Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w37394443 →Countries where authors are citing Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
This map shows the geographic impact of Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
This network shows the impact of Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
About Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
This paper, published in 2000, received 604 indexed citations . Written by Robert T. Watson, Ian Noble, Bert Bolin, N. H. Ravindranath, David J. Verardo and David Jon Dokken. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (366 citations), Soil Science (164 citations) and Ecology (128 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w37394443.