Ternary Alloys : A Comprehensive Compendium of Evaluated Constitutional Data and Phase Diagrams
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w37377225 →Countries where authors are citing Ternary Alloys : A Comprehensive Compendium of Evaluated Constitutional Data and Phase Diagrams
This map shows the geographic impact of Ternary Alloys : A Comprehensive Compendium of Evaluated Constitutional Data and Phase Diagrams. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ternary Alloys : A Comprehensive Compendium of Evaluated Constitutional Data and Phase Diagrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ternary Alloys : A Comprehensive Compendium of Evaluated Constitutional Data and Phase Diagrams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ternary Alloys : A Comprehensive Compendium of Evaluated Constitutional Data and Phase Diagrams
This network shows the impact of Ternary Alloys : A Comprehensive Compendium of Evaluated Constitutional Data and Phase Diagrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ternary Alloys : A Comprehensive Compendium of Evaluated Constitutional Data and Phase Diagrams.
About Ternary Alloys : A Comprehensive Compendium of Evaluated Constitutional Data and Phase Diagrams
This paper, published in 1989, received 287 indexed citations . Written by Günter Petzow, G. Effenberg, Fritz Aldinger, O.I. Bodak, Л. Л. Рохлин and P. Rogl covering the research area of Aerospace Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanical Engineering (233 citations), Materials Chemistry (118 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (97 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w37377225.