Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w36537914 →Countries where authors are citing Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues
This map shows the geographic impact of Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues
This network shows the impact of Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues.
About Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues
This paper, published in 1993, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by George Tchobanoglous, H. Theisen and Samuel A. Vigil covering the research area of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (882 citations), Building and Construction (290 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (213 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w36537914.