African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice
- Authors
- Garth Myers
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w36501124 →Countries where authors are citing African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice
This map shows the geographic impact of African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice
This network shows the impact of African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice.
About African Cities: Alternative Visions of Urban Theory and Practice
This paper, published in 2011, received 198 indexed citations . Written by Garth Myers covering the research area of Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Urban Studies (123 citations), Sociology and Political Science (50 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (49 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w36501124.