Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma.
Impact in
- Surgery 444
Classified as
- Authors
- Griffiths Ct
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w36386258 →Countries where authors are citing Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma.
This map shows the geographic impact of Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma.
This network shows the impact of Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma..
About Surgical resection of tumor bulk in the primary treatment of ovarian carcinoma.
This paper, published in 1975, received 625 indexed citations . Written by Griffiths Ct covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Reproductive Medicine (583 citations), Surgery (444 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (264 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (89 citations) and Oncology (79 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w36386258.