Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification
- Journal
- Neural Information Processing Systems
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3629323 →Countries where authors are citing Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification
This map shows the geographic impact of Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification
This network shows the impact of Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification.
About Distance Metric Learning for Large Margin Nearest Neighbor Classification
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Kilian Q. Weinberger, John Blitzer and Lawrence K. Saul covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (872 citations), Artificial Intelligence (473 citations) and Signal Processing (140 citations). Published in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3629323.