Predicting health behaviour : research and practice with social cognition models

878 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2005, received 878 indexed citations. Written by Mark Conner and Paul Norman covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Psychology (382 citations), General Health Professions (227 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (189 citations). Published in Open University Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3626119 →

Countries where authors are citing Predicting health behaviour : research and practice with social cognition models

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Predicting health behaviour : research and practice with social cognition models. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Predicting health behaviour : research and practice with social cognition models with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Predicting health behaviour : research and practice with social cognition models more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Predicting health behaviour : research and practice with social cognition models

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Predicting health behaviour : research and practice with social cognition models. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Predicting health behaviour : research and practice with social cognition models.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3626119.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026