WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs

1.4k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2014, received 1.4k indexed citations. Written by Robert J. Kurman, Maria Luisa Carcangiu, C. Simon Herrington and Robert H. Young covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Reproductive Medicine (772 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (712 citations) and Epidemiology (309 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3624451 →

Countries where authors are citing WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3624451.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026