A general mechanism for microsomal activation of quinone anticancer agents to free radicals.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w36146721 →Countries where authors are citing A general mechanism for microsomal activation of quinone anticancer agents to free radicals.
This map shows the geographic impact of A general mechanism for microsomal activation of quinone anticancer agents to free radicals.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A general mechanism for microsomal activation of quinone anticancer agents to free radicals. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A general mechanism for microsomal activation of quinone anticancer agents to free radicals. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A general mechanism for microsomal activation of quinone anticancer agents to free radicals.
This network shows the impact of A general mechanism for microsomal activation of quinone anticancer agents to free radicals.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A general mechanism for microsomal activation of quinone anticancer agents to free radicals..
About A general mechanism for microsomal activation of quinone anticancer agents to free radicals.
This paper, published in 1978, received 577 indexed citations . Written by Nicholas R. Bachur, Sandra Gordon and Malcolm V. Gee covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Toxicology and Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (280 citations), Oncology (154 citations) and Organic Chemistry (143 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w36146721.