Judgment analysis : theory, methods, and applications

495 indexed citations
published 1996
Authors
Ray Cooksey
Journal
Academic Press eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3584434 →

Countries where authors are citing Judgment analysis : theory, methods, and applications

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judgment analysis : theory, methods, and applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judgment analysis : theory, methods, and applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judgment analysis : theory, methods, and applications more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Judgment analysis : theory, methods, and applications

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Judgment analysis : theory, methods, and applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Judgment analysis : theory, methods, and applications.

About Judgment analysis : theory, methods, and applications

This paper, published in 1996, received 495 indexed citations . Written by Ray Cooksey. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Decision Sciences (125 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (84 citations), Social Psychology (73 citations), Sociology and Political Science (72 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (70 citations). Published in Academic Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3584434.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026