The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.
- Authors
- John F. Burke
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w35521632 →Countries where authors are citing The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.
This map shows the geographic impact of The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.
This network shows the impact of The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions..
About The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.
This paper, published in 1961, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by John F. Burke covering the research area of Epidemiology and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (761 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (201 citations) and Epidemiology (178 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w35521632.